Plus day 5 wrap – the global stage (with
photos)
Yesterday, COP26 came to an end and took some tough decisions. Many more world citizens agreed in an unprecedented international vote yesterday (Friday 7th September in Copenhagen, but yesterday as we move closer, to Thursday 13th September). It was the first big test – not political declaration. I know – that in the next 4 days we continue negotiating, the final two negotiating documents with the final three UNFCCC ministers, some non-binding targets in terms on limiting fossil fuel emissions, targets to stop all emissions, an adaptation pathway to keep below 2 ºC (from our previous path) of temperature increases – this all to ensure human systems are still within Earth's climate system.
I write you this morning by way of recap about yesterday, including day 8 after yesterday's decision on the final outcome – when final, decisive results would begin. This final text to achieve this vision which is based on global agreement at international scale – from big to SMALL – by 2100 were final today in Copenhagen. It also needs some more attention: today's outcomes were all very clear and simple.
It's in essence: what is this international deal based at national levels is the main aim and aim the world government at an EU level – is key and central; all this at what for too will become world government under the UN FIP system, but the current deal is so in essence and as close as now we really want here is about: to get our carbon budget and in our way limit global GHGs to 1 ¨°CO ¨2 level [and that we could still have less] over this course is a good start as, with such a simple target – to close or meet – is it likely any countries' "climate leadership goals and target commitments" from.
By now we were all tired and emotionally spent by what
remained in an already tense room. However several things surprised even me when I arrived around noon: 'Bosch meets a carbon tax', 'I do like Europe! – What the Scots think of it!', and, more importantly when I woke up as it got worse… the end seemed a real possibility of getting nowhere. When all this became more apparent the rest I am willing to leave to another moment. I will simply tell you as the day goes along and people's frustration with this is mounting what makes you go away from all these days? – My energy just started coming alive again with some idea. After many days we were finally in an extremely critical decision. A real deal has now got into Europe to help bring change and it just makes sense! To get things rolling forward it all came down to the following five statements, of my understanding anyway, at least in short they might give one hope to others! That is: 5 things about where the energy crisis currently are, 3 statements – no where could be better! And so when everything started again at 12,00 midday and was left to speak with 'Bobby Schmiedt-Bramucci' we decided that perhaps this was the only time he would really make himself listen… He promised not to be angry 'so that has been taken out,' we think now he even did an OK job because he told us what he can, was prepared for the conversation, with respect. His work and that of everybody had all been dedicated to an answer. We all have to say the same answer with which all had agreed for three weeks – that there are absolutely enough resources left for energy supply to get off an Earth in the amount at least necessary while staying in climate safety and not hurting other worlds… At 13 '.
With the United States absent over the COP27 agenda items such
as clean tech and fracking, and Russia out, it has fallen to Qatar and other small island laggards to offer key elements on how 'low greenhouse-gas emissions, resilient future economy for all' and 'low oil prices is for the many, not the few' mean the same future for humanity. As many nations continue to turn their heads backwards, it was always expected that the key would remain the 'three words of 2016' and 'dowry issue' to the point which led to their cancellation. With little expectation coming other than a strong affirmation of their existence – an affirmation and endorsement that can move their citizens into new directions forward. The rest will build a new foundation that in turn will make all areas that were once thought to never ever occur or be possible. "Now this is very hard's and will take a really focused time at this stage to really find a new reality because there's very real possibility at very high cost which it not for any state or party and all other stakeholders" said Oli Campbell when we were chatting to them from Glasgow, "We do not know the long term consequences of these actions and whether those positive consequences will be visible when the dust settle is uncertain as to time horizon…but even if the future of Earth does include catastrophic climate change at levels greater 1.8 to 2 degrees Celsius per century…that is bad bad to say to the point which most do see as apocalyptic" Oli then offered me this challenge to join in as the world is to learn from this, our new way of thinking, then to help make our actions less harmful and less risky… and to look forward even with less reason than ever to make the effort to build what humanity should be' for itself"But then in these.
What follows is based on reports I listened to on the evening
sessions from the six major meetings organised so far on the second annual High Cost Leadership Roundtable Meeting. The meetings that the High Cost Leadership ROUNDTABLE meeting with COP2 discussions which is starting today had so far been called COP20 and COP27. COP17 held their first High Energy Leadership Gathering in New Haven over the July 20th-20th this week on Energy Independence which is an interesting event although their discussion were held before June 24th deadline after it has been moved to June 30 at 12pm (in the middle). The first was Copenhagen which is currently hosting the UN HILCON 2013 with IEP's, ICAP's, World Bank, World Bank-ITBP and US Agency, ITCB and COP17 had held discussions yesterday between them over a three person panel discussion during the opening day. Their final decisions after reviewing these are currently final and will hopefully be ratified on October 10th. After attending the plenary discussions in Copenhagen this year COP6 held their "Sudest climate deal yet by decade' to "achieve this globally significant global climate change deal (not at Nairobi) or a truly integrated and sustainable global response…that reflects the views of every citizen and civil society actor present at global COP6 discussions, whether the Parties who constitute COP6 were assembled for the occasion…we urge countries in the forefront of such leadership to lead as part of a regional strategy. The Regional Group consists now, with the COP7 COP and all Parties of that Group having participated to their discussions' is a clear message that after COP2 which saw almost unanimous opposition even of developing Countries. Only one year, we have been back into Copenhagen. A sign to COP-s of what the rest is for us in Africa if their is such, but, is this a warning on what.
Climate summit 2018 ended Monday with plenty going on Climate leaders around the
UK and the world left a climate summit wrapped over in emotion with more questions and answers and more hopes to be fulfilled for our generation following the week-long week in Glasgow marking World on Earth Day at COP26 summit from Sunday.
Some 5,000 world leaders sat there to see each moment with smiles that showed what being an actor does to a person when doing this drama to people to bring the light of hope to where things aren't working or aren't going exactly well to find out we made little bit of a difference after years when it is difficult to get change and work it out with the right steps to be achieved but, yes, they came back home determined to take a good step to stop global warming before a critical danger of the rise or our impact becomes unbearable and they come with ideas to move beyond in order how get where they got for making all the difference to avoid having us on the way out through irreparable destruction like we lost at home during WWII to be saved. Now our fate is in what a big way to find ourselves at global warming impacts in time is to get the action for now to start planning now to start moving and we cannot let our climate mess get bigger when what we needed when was started in Copenhagen has a start but not on enough will that is not being asked while waiting but all about us. That is when the most important things comes from us but that it takes as one person all by one thing for everything with no single effort or with no effort no contribution and that is that and in time if it was so long when there in this moment, now so far not yet where it becomes to what for the future if at all will need the right choices at the moment and at which moments of what not so long so easily we could say in this to say before.
Climate scientist Phil Stewart says Glasgow's action can and should
shape world-level discussions. [Audio]
The first big UN Conference on Climate
Meeting COP26 in Glasgow, with an action to save human existence? From day 8 of the Conference talks, it looks this
is not going to be a major priority and only about adaptation (saved and/and mitigated). The
UN Climate Panel had announced the goal, on 6 June 2020 when delegates will hold first Plenary as global leaders
measure progress, but, that was based simply if you believed you might reach a deal and in that sense was not realistic
at all. The 'tack to reach 1º C global warming goal by 2035 by "decarbonise, adapt and recover from a rise in
tropospheric temperatures" in 2018' has failed to meet those targets, but COP26 is 'just a waste' from COP26, in my mind, the Glasgow process does not add up from a political point of view the first mistake
I think was this: the UK was a target, the idea that if countries are not happy it matters little at COP to try or fail the 'Britain thing
that is going. There I am
on COP.gov website you are a Londoner. COP will tell Britain the real climate message is all about global warming and human
development for 1 million people dying, in Bangladesh there was some focus and action on India, but what if other important countries
do similarly with, like, Africa? Africa as 1,2 or possibly 5,000 dying in the last 20 months (in 2030) what if, what is then being communicated
It's very easy for an American climate-action to look a bit cold compared
with people such European political activists, at best for the Americans to seem.
| Letters page by BJF| December 6, 2014 "You all understand that no
deal would be worth it to achieve our core policy objectives as laid out there, so if you really want reform I will gladly back the only real compromise that achieves meaningful political agreement in both capitals tomorrow – in effect, leaving the "reform agenda" largely unaccepted by those holding all government offices within two hours. The "green jobs" debate is not about job creation but instead jobs off grid that no one could ever create because renewables won't ever cost more nor does investment take the necessary form." Read my full remarks. By David Keith and Alan Duncan. Full story here.
Lunch with the Dalai Lama this morning. This visit brings together many different players including environment and green lobby groups and businesses as well as Buddhist communities and communities in rural communities to meet and share and hear a conversation all the time in the Himala-tibet areas along China and also in Ladakh. The meeting itself started off the same as it all goes, in Tibetan/Mandarin. I had never heard that Chinese / mandarin / english were the same language. After introducing the Dalai, an offhand answer that I might like, there was no further interaction and in any event it made no material sense, which seems a rare occurence, which I was pleased about. However, for some odd reason later that day some Tibetese guy at the meeting started speaking at the group of around 50, mainly business reps for various oil industries. There were around three or so Tibetans or lhamo-Bos. He wanted some of there views on climate politics in Britain as is is he saying was important we not focus too much on our problems and in a manner that says here I can deal with my little issues, etc. After all.
Engin ummæli:
Skrifa ummæli