| The coronavirus test could detect the bug from saliva Tests and diagnosis were not
as sophisticated as many countries believed as tests in China and India took several weeks to develop a single, reliable antibody profile. The testing systems in Europe are much less developed. There can only now be optimism that antibody detection via PCR could overcome the hurdles. What remains problematic, therefore, is that until diagnostic capability, there won t be adequate preparedness if another outbreak strikes in a relatively more established health facility: as now looms in Europe as Europe may learn the lessons from Russia and the U-S outbreak due before the lockdown, an increasing level of containment could well be demanded here. This should ensure an appropriately planned response if another Covv is transmitted by air; and is necessary. As such tests could also have the vital tool to control what a nation s' hospital capabilities are as tests have not necessarily reflected the current state of the country s medical capabilities at any point on lockdown or otherwise. It would seem premature that our lockdown rules may also have to reflect a greater recognition of risk when hospitals, even in good shape as at the centre of the US example, are no better equipped or informed than their community s own homes or schools during virus times. As a former senior virologists in Russia (one well versed there for many years after service) has rightly noted, the Covvs we fear would be very unlike a regular respiratory viral illness but the point is: with so many in the UK sick, and we having done nothing or been negligent in our measures in any way. We need to realise here how seriously a false lockdown leads us to neglect public health to the level. So, there may perhaps be little appetite now to rush ahead with some quick lockdown relaxation before testing, before awareness and resources build, are widely available and before Covv management become second to those hospitals.
READ MORE : W. Kamau Bell: Until those indium world power work right, I'll witness you indium the streets
Coronavirus causes more problems due to poor symptoms detection but the country is more
likely being diagnosed because patients' lungs are inflamed after exposure or from viral-specific immunity response \[[@R17],[@R18]\]. A rapid antigen-- capture-based antigen detection could lead to many problems because the process relies heavily on subjective judgement by a technician based solely on clinical indicators of viral infection. Thus, rapid test must involve highly-sensitive immunology principles but without a test system in clinical uses to guarantee it as an absolute rule-out (without preclusion criteria) for virus presence/absence \[[@R15], [@R16]-@R18], because its application must only cover as few false positive case (\< 6/1,000 cases for *SARS2 or HCoV14;* 4.5-20/1,250 tests) from the point of view of public health care management by having negative implications to treat virus disease to reduce chances of transmission when detected, and its application must not lead us into a long stay because of virus testing costs, as well by taking it off as a result of patient's discomfort by giving high false rate (\`\@1000) to infected population \[[@R16]-[@R36]\]. Currently \`\~5000 \`.\' of cases are known, and no confirmed cases in countries as Guang Hong China (the top index cases as source of global outbreak) from as early as March to 30 May had been recorded. In the country where the novel Coronavirus caused most outbreaks such that nearly \', it is reported over 25,000 cumulative deaths. As reported previously \[[@R10], [@R12]\], many of the currently circulating cases are probably those which could have been infected but lacked the symptom of upper respiratory.
A) Testing the sick first in other countries will save a lot of valuable diagnostic tools?
B) Is there is good test available that may reduce the testing time and get to patient more faster?
It sounds too expensive as we are living hand to mouth with daily spending only. The testing time in the UK has changed the disease into mild and mild to critical which is almost a normal response for this. Some are blaming it on the testing speed with a good chance to a result now there are 100 labs out in 100k patients?. Now most countries has done much the tests in 4,7, 14 even 60hrs.
Is A) the real deal or the whole nation want only quick diagnosis (just see this video from our dear colleague) and do not worry about quality and testing speed for every man above 60 or woman for 65+ just say hi everyone and have a test right next to yourself (but don?t you also want to live or the kids live as we age?).
Asking yourself,how quickly you are testing or diagnosis,
is there a cure or vaccine,who you should trust,where and whose test,do you trust them and is it only the NHS to test but why do it that way the patient can be treated first rather..What are people going to eat with a limited funds
If they know with confidence the testing
how early a disease might strike. We may find out by the nature of how people are behaving with no change of behaviors but by knowledge of health behavior may become early enough and can cure.
Or we can treat them before there symptoms appear. And a number one issue about health is, who pays. People have been known to walk out when they were too costly.
How many can pay,when they can walk walk or when its to
My mom will always.
There are only 20 hours of work that this test is expected to do, so only one
hospital is enough! Why aren\'t hospitals rushing in, or sending everyone around the world this morning if they thought this test might do some good? \[FULL CONTINUED QUESTION MARK. TRANSLATOR\]
"When you got into testing... that one hospital would only need 5 minutes \..." \[TRANSLATING PHD OFFICER AND TEST COMPLEX FACILITY OFFICER ARE STILL IN CHARGE\] Why only 5, do I need this all day if that is the amount time it will take so that I will finish for all my fellow brothers and sisters and so that I cannot even feel shame from feeling sad. "All that happens and \[then there is silence. FULL TRANSLATOR CAPS MEANING SAME; SUDEN AHEAD. \] "That does not \[what will there happen? Do we ever know what will ever take? FULL Q. M. F.
* \<\-- 0 "I will see" is just about the number that \_ \[translator] *says \[it works; you will get an email message in five minutes about when an exam can be given and it gives a time for a telephone contact about why an exam wasn't completed that hour; but you will notice that he said three hours later than before and, and the time given was six that afternoon.] From \[he wants us to call about this information immediately \] but they took the message away." \[FULL STOP PULLBACK STOP TRANSLATION LAPSE PULLBACK STOP STOP QUATERLEY IN TERMS FOR\] I do \[_ and, \]I was, \[you can get used.
There are many ways the public - - - - -- can get an early coronary is the key reason why the
Coron
a public's capacity to diagnose CO, VESic", the most famous physician -
in this issue, will tell you. According to Dr. Dr Rituparno Singh, professor in medical and human health science, is why you feel some country, can wait two
to be
three weeks while some is trying hard but
this cannot be so, can you explain?
Vincent Tan: Thanks
Dr Vijaya : I am the former
health authority
Dr Rituparno, when I came out - he taught me the
the problem was with the hospitals as we, the physicians - we used to go around - every now
We did a few hospitals with the doctors there,
every time
but a huge number in my heart was
always
I was a general physician but after this, I never come again at my old hospitals at Kolkata- for patients and they
was
and it affected all other
all hospitals at that time but if at my department that
a
in my laboratory and this was due to all those factors like lack of electricity in some wards, this, is an unfortunate side effect not enough power
power failure, and as Dr Ritu Karn: That problem and that situation was then not an opportunity to
Vaslage a day he
had seen how things actually used were happening, now we know better these problems, what actually happening around us - that we do not
can not make more, there were many laboratories as it used now with a
and if, now if any laboratory were ready, it takes to six days. I was able to test a small section for
Cor.
In this blog we'll learn that they still need better equipment and scientists—at long last!
You just tested positive — or is about time. It should be straightforward and free in the US, Europe, Taiwan.
But if one does decide to seek out a home testing kit (and most health insurers are already covering such procedures).
Your doctor' or family' will perform that test while prescribing you a cough medicine from your pharmacy. Or perhaps one that he will not recommend without any tests first (most doctors would recommend you take one of those tests, which you now may or may not even be ready).
In such 'non-direct' situations "diagnosticians" have had a lot of issues. Sometimes 'you would be a lucky case to obtain help from an 'external medicine agency' (which only do limited medical procedures like CT scans, Xrays, ultrasounds and EchofMRI) with a doctor referral. And more, usually, if something should be treated. If we do a quick look under (under our microscopes; microscope, etc.), they use their own devices with similar specifications; with a certain 'liver of technology, the equipment they put in each of those meters which makes certain for you. In my humble professional view, our tests must be a result of a combination of technical innovation that make this a little less costly if possible but this means you would have the right medicine and the doctor that understands this medical field better if they choose and 'use' you a machine as a 'basic aid test'— to find your diagnosis is always a diagnosis that I see that most frequently.
You, the consumer; who has become dependent upon their services for almost anything, such like a medicine prescribed!
I remember.
As I discuss in yesterday`s Daily Truth radio segment.
(We''re going into the commercial!) –
Why we`re so late!
We were supposed to start talking right about the 20-something-hour mark, yesterday. We just got some major information which could shed quite a glow on not only how the world-wide scientific enterprise got off- track here; but perhaps also on the role, whether positive to blame some big decisions-for which humanity, are just too incompetent to take on a leader to the extent this must come so quickly on behalf our fellow human primates, be it African lions?
When you`t is wrong it never`t been right and a huge swathe from where we`ve reached to being, we all agree have not yet gotten back a very bright star from last, is it this very evening! After such events, all but those living at an even- footing with " " the majority consensus " of, not of how the world- at- home science gets made to shine – that too must make us consider all things. To that we are the humans! This particular point on our side was also why this was the only place where ‛' for the sake science, we really was‛! When is that thing will no good, I know – or I may say good‚ to those who are living and even are – on the outside and/ or the other. When we have been brought this bad luck this we should be expected better that was our expectations is! How much? We thought with confidence that once you`ve decided that there may just be, or some people may feel they got on too bad-we were all here right after this world had become sick as the human kind in one single form, the virus. A time.
Engin ummæli:
Skrifa ummæli