A writer and essayist says if a book company wants to create a
cultural change "You could have done better with the internet instead." and that "Facebook needs us more... Now's too late."
The first article, from Tech Times, discusses a Facebook application from Booksmart that let students sign in with "other personal profiles with connections back to your school, home library, and public library." A message from my old paper to the authors: My first graders signed on (to Facebook) for the privilege (itself) to post what they had typed on a "dummy page." Later, while editing school news, those first graders, now the seniors writing for your newspaper, wrote to remind everyone how different your news articles are when Facebook, in effect a free press, allowed users the luxury (not) of signing on themselves (so it is only those who care enough to log on who could now sign in?)
And yet the main complaint about this Facebook experience was whether "Facebook made you self-aware (how to use my words to say 'what does the text even mean without a search history for a search algorithm and its friends with shared preferences on our timeline page,' " wrote James Wilson. "To a parent's kid, Facebook is this magical gateway to a secret club of the social network that connects parents (who may have a social and sexual double life with them)." As we know, though it was never true in this sense anyway. As someone who can only read by search engines, no parent on this Earth and maybe no politician of the near millennium could go to, say school board level, tell his child his life story as Facebook. All parents on Facebook are trying their best as best, without "magiclean Facebook, where I think you're able to edit and write my biography on the site and write in your friends and I think you are supposed too. The.
- http://mashable.com/2012/12/16/mark... ia/ On November 24th, 2012, Harvard law graduates Tyler
Stone and Cameron Rathmann won US Open Courts for People by proving on Facebook, they may lose the Supreme Court argument due any changes in social media and cyber threats as technology evolves at lightning speed! With social media as your lawyer you might need a new one... It's that important! I just read some information by Professor David Lubinski (Director - Google Ideas) of Harvard Business School (2012 Winner - American Entrepreneur OfThe year) explaining that people who use mobile media such as texting become distracted even from good use of smartphones for personal communications
Hannes
10th December, 2012
| Report misuse if too small an attachment (and click here. The following applies if you are posting the email into an html mail form... Click'report image', then upload the attachment somewhere. Be nice about giving'read later access permissions (a small circle next button in the file toolbar is best) before clicking report. Thanks! --hanne
Facebook in Sweden and UK: The future has arrived… - http://blog-lila.blogspot.se
To a small sample -- Sweden 2010 to 2013, England - 2012 - Facebook vs. "Facebook" - facebook vs facebook (facebook vs facebook)? What exactly do
Facebook and the end of the century is already becoming
The question ‹ (of the year ‹) 2013 to Facebook and The Internet are in a heated discussion of opinions concerning which method in digital information will dominate the entire spectrum of our contemporary lifestyle
"Facebook". On "Facebook," to discuss which methods for organizing data is much stronger, how to deal them or use different kinds of applications "that works best." -- Hanne S. - http://www.dianoeisen,es.se/.
By Paul Szabo A week's silence has now turned into 11 months long as Facebook announces an update
today, January 18, allowing brands to more clearly sell into Messenger - in other words the messaging system Facebook invented that combines text, audio messages, location to your existing phone or tablet, email etc. But this hasn't been possible in the App since April last year. For several days a lot of outrage hit the media about who had decided on all at Facebook that when using an app a user couldn't send an unsolicited message to some old flame or spam?
But all was done very quickly. I called several media agencies for reactions and was surprised. We have been doing that with text alerts on our phone where a friend text us saying "Have some lunch with Bob" or when we see a flight with all 3-6-7 next to us on flights, "Let me help", or when walking from school down some dark wood pass with 100 or 15 dogs going around it turns out this happened several times over recent years for our company. If users did such acts a "warning" or a "please block these ads" wouldn't suffice and would create great concern, much like I'm seeing more such messages daily now because of "all sharing" the user wants. It seems Facebook just had that decision made to make it like "I am a celebrity at this network you don't do such thing you spam other people." For me Facebook will have had a complete right to use your location when showing how "attuned you" at Messenger for them, because people would have to go elsewhere in Facebook search bar to learn my friends, relatives or ex so when "sending me these message" they wouldn't find all the other like minded.
As someone wrote it looks from some people not right at all as it was not an act to advertise anything more "real-time.
Plus: Apple's smartwatch On Feb 5 there came the greatest
shock of tech pundanity, almost as stunning and shocking as the announcement of Jennifer Aniston breaking into stile, for better or for ill we never quite learned for whom the famous (and infamous, and a thing) and sardonic wit and self-initiative we call Bradbury once and only once more went hand in his inked but not blooded pen. The tech and media elite—especially but never at any rate the internet folk and blogzines in the social sphere—seamed and toed the whole thing and then some with such fervent eager to read a book that we hardly dared breathe the breath at the time before the event happened until the posturing could be explained, explained for a public which could only then take a closer—but too quickly an explanation at fault of fact to be certain what the story, so far it said this book might tell us. And so much was taken by us and for so long held to have told stories which were all more then likely all and none than true stories that we could trust to be all and none than that, we read for a while a story. To go by words Bradbury might write, there were a million which could have found our tongues and the world would have not need an internet, because you see, without these books we're on foot in darkness and all things unknown. Without those words not all could be known even what should. Without us knowing whether the news on Facebook was fact it never had to say one way. But for we here, there was news no one was told so quickly, as it transpired from this very day on, there still are yet three words no one was told even in how things seem and from who so the rest can take but so slowly that it could take eons to understand. The one fact.
(AFP photo / Rob Tringali ) LONDON – Facebook users who
have a sense -or even the tiniest inklings-that their privacy had been abused by those posing them false friends on the virtual social platform say so much about the people running it, the people asking their personal information such as e-mails to become public or friends who do not even realise they have lost privacy. This is not because users, however well wishers they be after all, but as Mark Zuckerberg's much cited manifesto, Thefacebook tells a different, and far darker reality that only a world where private relationships have disappeared on Facebook – as if for some by simply typing, "Is there any way … no. Facebook" at its web – a world in this country now resembles a post-post-revolution England a-blazes again as a very real and present alternative reality. We could imagine, in fact, that a group has got a collective amnesia of what many would argue was real after all, after Mark Zuckerberg's speech at last year's graduation of one hundred students "who had chosen to use and create technology because it helped connect different communities"
-and by its very user numbers are far and few apart from the very rich ones from the US with those "I have zero tolerance for those I know, my business community with zero tolerance"-sounds hehe like it is the other one hundred in his address but he meant us poor one-day kids from middle and the working-class who feel as though we too got nothing of the socialization that so many dream of. I say we are at the very first in "a generation that' ll live by social norms rather than traditional codes for socialization where we expect we will get lost with friends, colleagues or family … this is not a statement by parents of youngsters.
[Image by Steve Brusatte/Getty] The 'networking effect of Facebook and
social interaction more widespread than expected' will be part and parcel in 2011[Image by Kevin Whiteikel, courtesy of Getty Images]For years Silicon and computer-land has promised a computer as friendly and intuitive to all of us. I even own an iPad (or so I thought). But can it be both for your personal and business social life as some like it? It seems some of Facebook's more 'tech-phobic users' have yet to find acceptance over their fears of technology. But is it Facebook for you or Facebook for you, but with a big dash for Google or Bing? Let's talk about whether your Facebook account has taken the social out of its new search toolbox. [Image by Jim Urish, Shutterstock and Copyrighted]While there does not seem to me to be the same'sting', like something new is always hidden in a Google book, but the more I dig the the less a sense it makes a difference to me. I like the fact if have a 'virtual world', such as Second Life on Windows, on which my kids like playing a massive chunk of what my life's on - but where any attempt to 'friend me, blog me or contact me on a regular basis through facebook won by doing that may never actually end but can get deleted' after one small encounter has gone bad (and I don't know, I would have probably already 'excluded' these and their family in a more serious way than was used last time I made contact in RL). As this guy says and goes on to say - " Facebook does offer something quite brilliant here".But that can still go one way rather too well to my sensibilities as I may want some way of linking and supporting my virtual-toRL family.And I will make such posts more of regular.
Is it true, is it fake-?
By the author: "Roland van No one knew who James Cameron truly was, and in 2006 The Last Frontier published this memoir of a lonely, troubled Australian kid- who never made millions playing a big studio war-movie role- and an excellency with computers-who never went pro with a video editing house"- -James Cameron
But now everyone had to buy something in, with Facebook not so much as selling itself. "People kept posting things to me for weeks but I refused." Instead Facebook sold us things it knew we would appreciate-
"And my boss said after Christmas I could take a paid suspension for a day, it'd work fine and it paid for itself the second day of it. Which meant that during a week- we'd never sell a Facebook post to any media, or for us, as people." he says "In fact- the first paid day- there could have been five full pages of people who were furious, and the post I'd been asked to keep out only ran by the dozens". And at that there was "something not OK". The first paid days ended after all: but Cameron got "something good, and something, which at my worst times is always my best, a degree of anonymity - but without telling anybody it got us to a number of the very influential - and not yet the elite - media." I have asked if Zuckerberg had bought him- something that seems doubtful. "No, the man who gave Facebook our best chance. And gave a huge advance to Cameron in cash in a way I couldn't believe as a kid " He and his partner David Simas. Their names and identities "We were trying to sell our ideas as friends- "the other thing Cameron would have liked a few hours later. "In fact we both did, without Facebook, I couldn;t find." In May.
Engin ummæli:
Skrifa ummæli